500 vs ECSTATIC, head-to-head
500 and ECSTATIC have met 2 times in the last 12 months of tracked play: tied 1 - 1. Latest meeting: Dec 6, 2025 at Galaxy Battle 2025 // Phase 5.
Recent meetings
- Dec 6, 2025: 500 1 - 2 ECSTATIC (Galaxy Battle 2025 // Phase 5)
- Nov 7, 2025: 500 2 - 0 ECSTATIC (CCT Season 3 European Series 10)
Head-to-head record
Across 2 meetings in the last 12 months, 500 won 1 and ECSTATIC won 1, over 5 decided maps.
Opening map
500 won the first map 1 time and ECSTATIC won it 1 time. 500 went on to win that series. ECSTATIC went on to win that series.
Dominance
ECSTATIC average 0.2 more rounds per map than 500 across 5 maps. Large numbers mean blowouts, small ones mean close maps.
Recency edge
Weighting each win by how recent it is, with the weight halving every 90 days, the split is 44.4% to 500 and 55.6% to ECSTATIC.
Map record in these meetings
- Ancient: 500 1, ECSTATIC 1
- Inferno: 500 1, ECSTATIC 1
- Dust II: 500 1, ECSTATIC 0
Common opponents
Both teams have played 14 of the same opponents in the last 12 months. Against all of them combined, 500 are 10 - 10 and ECSTATIC are 14 - 8.
- Against CYBERSHOKE: 500 1 - 1, ECSTATIC 3 - 0
- Against EYEBALLERS: 500 1 - 0, ECSTATIC 1 - 2
- Against Johnny Speeds: 500 0 - 2, ECSTATIC 1 - 1
- Against Oramond: 500 0 - 1, ECSTATIC 2 - 1
- Against Sangal: 500 0 - 2, ECSTATIC 2 - 0
- Against SPARTA: 500 3 - 0, ECSTATIC 1 - 0
- Against Monte: 500 0 - 2, ECSTATIC 0 - 1
- Against AaB: 500 1 - 0, ECSTATIC 1 - 0
The eight they have played most are listed; 6 further shared opponents are counted in the combined record above but not shown.
Where these teams differ
500 are strongest on Nuke 58.8% from 17 plays, Mirage 52.9% from 17 plays, Ancient 51.9% from 27 plays.
Over their last 8 matches 500 faced ranked opposition averaging world number 73.5.
ECSTATIC are strongest on Ancient 67.5% from 40 plays, Nuke 54.3% from 35 plays, Inferno 54.2% from 24 plays.
Map rates cover the last 12 months against all opponents, not just this matchup. A map played fewer than 4 times is left out of it.