aAa vs CYBERSHOKE, head-to-head
aAa and CYBERSHOKE have met 1 time in the last 12 months of tracked play: CYBERSHOKE lead 1 - 0. Latest meeting: Apr 30, 2026 at BC.Game Masters Season 2 Europe Series 1.
Recent meetings
- Apr 30, 2026: aAa 0 - 2 CYBERSHOKE (BC.Game Masters Season 2 Europe Series 1)
Head-to-head record
Across 1 meeting in the last 12 months, aAa won 0 and CYBERSHOKE won 1, over 2 decided maps.
Opening map
aAa won the first map 0 times and CYBERSHOKE won it 1 time. CYBERSHOKE went on to win that series.
Dominance
CYBERSHOKE average 11 more rounds per map than aAa across 2 maps. Large numbers mean blowouts, small ones mean close maps.
Recency edge
Weighting each win by how recent it is, with the weight halving every 90 days, the split is 0% to aAa and 100% to CYBERSHOKE.
Map record in these meetings
- Ancient: aAa 0, CYBERSHOKE 1
- Dust II: aAa 0, CYBERSHOKE 1
Common opponents
Both teams have played 6 of the same opponents in the last 12 months. Against all of them combined, aAa are 2 - 7 and CYBERSHOKE are 4 - 3.
- Against GenOne: aAa 0 - 2, CYBERSHOKE 1 - 1
- Against ex-Zero Tenacity: aAa 1 - 1, CYBERSHOKE 0 - 1
- Against Phantom: aAa 0 - 2, CYBERSHOKE 1 - 0
- Against Just Players: aAa 1 - 0, CYBERSHOKE 1 - 0
- Against Lavked: aAa 0 - 1, CYBERSHOKE 0 - 1
- Against STATE: aAa 0 - 1, CYBERSHOKE 1 - 0
Where these teams differ
aAa are strongest on Dust II 41.2% from 17 plays, Nuke 26.7% from 15 plays, Inferno 18.8% from 16 plays.
Over their last 8 matches aAa faced ranked opposition averaging world number 69.2.
CYBERSHOKE are strongest on Dust II 63.6% from 66 plays, Ancient 58.3% from 48 plays, Nuke 53.5% from 43 plays.
Over their last 8 matches CYBERSHOKE faced ranked opposition averaging world number 58.4.
Map rates cover the last 12 months against all opponents, not just this matchup. A map played fewer than 4 times is left out of it.