Lazer Cats vs WW, head-to-head
Lazer Cats and WW have met 2 times in the last 12 months of tracked play: WW lead 2 - 0. Latest meeting: Feb 24, 2026 at European Pro League Series 5.
Recent meetings
- Feb 24, 2026: Lazer Cats 0 - 2 WW (European Pro League Series 5)
- Feb 13, 2026: Lazer Cats 1 - 2 WW (ESL Challenger League Season 51: Europe - Cup 1)
Head-to-head record
Across 2 meetings in the last 12 months, Lazer Cats won 0 and WW won 2, over 5 decided maps.
Opening map
Lazer Cats won the first map 0 times and WW won it 2 times. WW went on to win both of those series.
Dominance
WW average 3.4 more rounds per map than Lazer Cats across 5 maps. Large numbers mean blowouts, small ones mean close maps.
Recency edge
Weighting each win by how recent it is, with the weight halving every 90 days, the split is 0% to Lazer Cats and 100% to WW.
Map record in these meetings
- Dust II: Lazer Cats 0, WW 2
- Inferno: Lazer Cats 1, WW 1
- Nuke: Lazer Cats 0, WW 1
Common opponents
Both teams have played 16 of the same opponents in the last 12 months. Against all of them combined, Lazer Cats are 13 - 10 and WW are 15 - 7.
- Against Nemesis: Lazer Cats 0 - 1, WW 3 - 1
- Against kONO: Lazer Cats 1 - 1, WW 2 - 0
- Against SPARTA: Lazer Cats 2 - 0, WW 2 - 0
- Against NOVAQ: Lazer Cats 1 - 1, WW 2 - 0
- Against aimclub: Lazer Cats 2 - 0, WW 0 - 1
- Against ENCE Academy: Lazer Cats 1 - 1, WW 0 - 1
- Against KOLESIE: Lazer Cats 0 - 2, WW 0 - 1
- Against QUAZAR: Lazer Cats 1 - 1, WW 0 - 1
The eight they have played most are listed; 8 further shared opponents are counted in the combined record above but not shown.
Where these teams differ
Lazer Cats are strongest on Ancient 58.3% from 36 plays, Anubis 50% from 12 plays, Inferno 46.2% from 26 plays.
WW are strongest on Dust II 67.8% from 59 plays, Mirage 65.1% from 43 plays, Nuke 43.3% from 30 plays.
Over their last 8 matches WW faced ranked opposition averaging world number 68.5.
Map rates cover the last 12 months against all opponents, not just this matchup. A map played fewer than 4 times is left out of it.